Abstract
This commentary focuses on Rozmarin's use of Levinas to critique psychoanalytic theories of being and of knowing. The commentary explores the psychoanalytic implications of Levinas's unique use of “otherness” and of the crisis in relatedness and ethics that arises in conventional understandings of knowing and relating to another. Using a clinical example, I raise questions that address the tensions in postmodern and enlightenment elements in psychoanalytic theory, the place of ambivalence, and the potential role for a view of multiple subjectivities.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.