Abstract

C. Patak maintains that the motor analyzed by L. Xu et al. in the above-titled paper (see ibid., vol.26, no.2, p.229-36 (1990)) cannot operate as specified by the authors. R.M. Davis, in a separate discussion points out that the above-titled paper is based on earlier work by L. Xu and T.A. Lipo (1987, 1988) that had prompted him to publish a paper in which he reached a completely opposite conclusion, and that L. Xu et al. have neither noted nor referenced his work. In reply, L. Xu et al. point out that Patak has been misled by Fig. 4 of their paper and provide clarification. They also explain why they did not consider Davis's paper and rebut his arguments. They also note that the captions for Figs. 14 and 15 of their paper should be reversed. >

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.