Abstract

This communication article presents a discussion of various fundamental points pertaining to the Toksöz Hozatlıoğlu and Yılmaz (2023) (the Authors) investigation [published in Transp. Infrastruct. Geotechnol. 10(3), 474–487], specifically scrutinizing the practical ramifications of employing the liquid limit (LL) parameter (by itself) to infer soil expansivity. Based on previous experimental investigations and their own independent analyses presented in this article, the Discussers demonstrate that without proper consideration of soil mineralogical activity, the sole reliance on the LL parameter (as adopted in the Authors’ investigation) is often not a reliable basis for performing soil expansivity assessments. Accordingly, the LL-based fuzzy classification approach reported by the Authors, despite addressing potential uncertainties arising from LL determinations by the Casagrande percussion-cup method, would, in itself, not lead to significantly more reliable soil expansivity assessments. As a way forward, a practical and more realistic classification framework for expansive soils based on equilibrium sediment volume measurements is presented and compared to the LL-based scheme adopted in the Authors’ investigation. Through this endeavor, it is demonstrated that the sole reliance on the LL parameter generally produces overly conservative soil expansivity rankings.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.