Abstract

The purpose of this article is twofold: to theoretically assess ideational and organizational explanatory factors in the adoption of artificial intelligence policies; and to examine the extent to which the European Union has managed to facilitate a coordinated artificial intelligence policy in the Nordic countries. The study utilizes a mixed-methods approach based on systematic web searching, systematic policy document analysis and key informant semi-structured interviews. The study finds that the European Union has utilized framing-based strategies to set an agenda for a coordinated European artificial intelligence policy. Moreover, the strategy has affected member-state artificial intelligence policies to the extent that key tenets of European Union artificial intelligence discourse have penetrated Nordic public documents. However, the extent to which the Nordic countries incorporate European Union artificial intelligence policy discourse diverges at the national level. Differentiated national organizational capacities among Nordic countries make the adoption of artificial intelligence policies divergent. This observation is theoretically accounted for through a conversation between organizational theory of public governance and discursive institutionalism. The study argues that the framing of European Union artificial intelligence policies is filtered through organizational structures among states. Points for practitioners The study illuminates how policymakers in the Nordic countries are affected by the European Union when crafting their own artificial intelligence policies. The European Commission profoundly influences the policymaking of member states and affiliated states through the policy strategy of policy framing. The Commission uses this soft measure to nudge member states to comply with the European Union policy framework. Second, the study shows how ‘organizations matter’: variation in national organizational capacities in the Nordic states contributes to variation in national policy adoption. Even though Nordic countries adopt European Union-level policy frames, their implementation is shaped by varying organizational capacities available at the national level.

Highlights

  • The exponential increase in business investment, research and development (R&D) and the technical performance of artificial intelligence (AI) (Perrault et al, 2019) has impelled the idea that AI is central to the ‘fourth industrial revolution’ (Schwab, 2017)

  • This largely corresponds to European Union (EU)-level developments: when AI is on the agenda in the EU, it is on the agenda in the Nordic countries

  • The fact that the Nordic countries and the Commission increasingly addressed AI policy especially after 2017 does not by itself suggest that Nordic countries have been adopting EU-level AI policy; rather, this could reflect global AI developments at the time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The exponential increase in business investment, research and development (R&D) and the technical performance of artificial intelligence (AI) (Perrault et al, 2019) has impelled the idea that AI is central to the ‘fourth industrial revolution’ (Schwab, 2017). A contemporary notion is to believe that AI will transform both modern societies and science at scale (Appenzeller, 2017; Harari, 2017). Such transformative potential is echoed within the discourse on ‘smart government’ and ‘big data’, in which opportunities often seem endless (Maciejewski, 2017; Siugzdiniene_ et al, 2019). This has initiated a stark worldwide increase in soft policy, such as ethical guidelines and AI strategies (Jobin et al, 2019). By examining member-state AI policies, this study asks to what extent the Commission managed to facilitate a coordinated policy framework within the member states

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call