Abstract

Separate groups of Long-Evans rats were trained to discriminate either 0.56 or 1.0mg/kg buspirone i.p. in a two-lever, drug vs no-drug discrimination procedure. Training took twice as long for the lower versus the higher training-dose group. Generalization tests were conducted with buspirone (0.1-1.8mg/kg, i.p., 0.32-10mg/kg, p.o.), pentylenetetrazole (1-18mg/kg, i.p.), meprobamate (3.2-180mg/kg, p.o.), haloperidol (0.01-0.32mg/kg, i.p.), and 8-OH-DPAT (0.01-0.32mg/kg, i.p.). Buspirone p.o. was 0.5-1.0 log(10) units less potent than buspirone i.p. in producing dose-dependent generalization (i.e. > 80% buspirone-lever responding). Dose-effect functions for the 1.0 training-dose group were to the right of those for the 0.56 group. Partial generalization to meprobamate occurred in both groups, representing the first report of overlap of the buspirone discriminative stimulus with that of another anxiolytic. Complete generalization to 8-OH-DPAT occurred, consistent with buspirone's prominent 5HT(1A)-receptor activity and replicating findings in the pigeon. Partial generalization to haloperidol was concluded: every rat generalized to haloperidol, but the gradients did not increase monotonically and drug-lever responding at a given dose was inconsistent within and across rats. The haloperidol results suggest a stronger influence of the dopaminergic component in the buspirone discriminative stimulus in rats than was found with pigeons. Although a previous study found generalization to buspirone from pentylenetetrazole in baboons, there was no generalization to pentylenetetrazole from buspirone in the present study.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.