Abstract

Many studies have identified binding preferences for transcription factors (TFs), but few have yielded predictive models of how combinations of transcription factor binding sites generate specific levels of gene expression. Synthetic promoters have emerged as powerful tools for generating quantitative data to parameterize models of combinatorial cis-regulation. We sought to improve the accuracy of such models by quantifying the occupancy of TFs on synthetic promoters in vivo and incorporating these data into statistical thermodynamic models of cis-regulation. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation-seq, we measured the occupancy of Gcn4 and Cbf1 in synthetic promoter libraries composed of binding sites for Gcn4, Cbf1, Met31/Met32 and Nrg1. We measured the occupancy of these two TFs and the expression levels of all promoters in two growth conditions. Models parameterized using only expression data predicted expression but failed to identify several interactions between TFs. In contrast, models parameterized with occupancy and expression data predicted expression data, and also revealed Gcn4 self-cooperativity and a negative interaction between Gcn4 and Nrg1. Occupancy data also allowed us to distinguish between competing regulatory mechanisms for the factor Gcn4. Our framework for combining occupancy and expression data produces predictive models that better reflect the mechanisms underlying combinatorial cis-regulation of gene expression.

Highlights

  • Regulated gene expression lies at the heart of many biological processes including development [1,2], differentiation [3] and environmental responses [4,5,6]

  • Cbf1, Gcn4, Met31 and Nrg1 were each tagged by creating in-frame fusions to the C-myc-Avi epitope tag [49] at the native chromosomal locus of each transcription factors (TFs)

  • The results suggest that the switching behavior of Gcn4 is not a result of differential affinity of Gcn4 for its binding site between the glucose and amino acid starvation (AAS) conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Regulated gene expression lies at the heart of many biological processes including development [1,2], differentiation [3] and environmental responses [4,5,6]. Investigators have attempted to learn the binding site specificities of TFs through a variety of methods, including the analysis of promoters of suspected targets [15,16,17,18], the analysis of sequences bound in vivo by the TF using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays (ChIP-Chip, ChIP-seq) [19,20,21,22,23,24] and through in vitro binding studies [25,26,27]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.