Abstract

Forensic chemistry is an important area of analytical chemistry. This field has been rapidly growing over the last several decades. Confirmation of the human origins of bloodstains is important in practical forensics. Current serological blood tests are destructive and often provide false positive results. Here, we report on the development of a nondestructive method that could potentially be applied at the scene for differentiation of human and animal blood using attenuated total reflection Fourier transform-infrared (ATR FT-IR) spectroscopy and statistical analysis. The following species were used to build statistical models for binary human–animal blood differentiation: cat, dog, rabbit, horse, cow, pig, opossum, and raccoon. Three other species (deer, elk, and ferret) were used for external validation. A partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) was used for classification purposes and showed excellent performance in internal cross-validation (CV). The method was externally validated first using blood samples from new donors of species used in the training data set, and second using donors of new species that were not used to construct the model. Both validations showed excellent results demonstrating potential of the developed approach for nondestructive, rapid, and statistically confident discrimination between human and animal blood for forensic purposes.

Highlights

  • Forensic chemistry is an important area of analytical chemistry

  • Our laboratory has demonstrated that Raman spectroscopy in combination with chemometrics allows for identification of species using bloodstain analysis[8,11,12,13]

  • In this study, ATR FT-IR spectroscopy was combined with advanced statistical analysis to distinguish human blood from that of a range of animal species

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Forensic chemistry is an important area of analytical chemistry. This field has been rapidly growing over the last several decades. The method was externally validated first using blood samples from new donors of species used in the training data set, and second using donors of new species that were not used to construct the model Both validations showed excellent results demonstrating potential of the developed approach for nondestructive, rapid, and statistically confident discrimination between human and animal blood for forensic purposes. The two most common confirmatory assays for blood are the Teichmann and Takayama tests, which are both microcrystal tests[5] Immunoassay tests, such as ABAcard® HemaTrace® and HemDirect Hemoglobin are routine human blood identification methods[6,7]. Discrimination between human and animal blood is especially important for hitand-run cases when a suspect claims an incident involved an animal and not a human In such cases, it is very advantageous to test any bloodstains on the suspect’s car to determine their origin. Fujihara et al.[15] demonstrated that a portable

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call