Abstract
This paper examines welfare effects of monetary policy implementation in a sticky price model. The central bank’s plan under discretionary optimization is forward-looking and exhibits multiple solutions if transactions frictions are not negligibly small. The central bank can implement autoregressive solutions to the plan by inertial interest rate adjustments or by money transfers. These solutions can be associated with lower welfare losses than a minimum state variable solution to the plan implemented by non-inertial interest rate adjustments. The welfare gain from a history dependent policy implementation tends to rise with the strength of transactions frictions and the degree of price flexibility. It is further shown that the central bank’s plan can uniquely be implemented in a history dependent way by money transfers, but not by (inertial) interest rate adjustments. Yet, the latter remains the first choice if transactions frictions are negligible.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.