Abstract

EPR experiment on $K^0-\bar{K}^0$ system in 1998\cite{1} strongly hints that one should use operators $\hat{E}_c=-i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}$ and $\hat{\bf p}_c=i\hbar\nabla$ for the wavefunction (WF) of antiparticle. Further analysis on Klein-Gordon (KG) equation reveals that there is a discrete symmetry hiding in relativistic quantum mechanics (RQM) that ${\cal P}{\cal T}={\cal C}$. Here ${\cal P}{\cal T}$ means the (newly defined) combined space-time inversion (with ${\bf x}\to -{\bf x}, t\to-t$), while ${\cal C}$ the transformation of WF $\psi$ between particle and its antiparticle whose definition is just residing in the above symmetry. After combining with Feshbach-Villars (FV) dissociation of KG equation ($\psi=\phi+\chi$)\cite{2}, this discrete symmetry can be rigorously reformulated by the invariance of coupling equation of $\phi$ and $\chi$ under either the combined space-time inversion ${\cal P}{\cal T}$ or the mass inversion ($m\to -m$), which makes the KG equation a self-consistent theory. Dirac equation is also discussed accordingly. Various applications of this discrete symmetry are discussed, including the prediction of antigravity between matter and antimatter as well as the reason why we believe neutrinos are likely the tachyons.

Highlights

  • In 1956-1957, the historical discovery of the parity violation [3,4,5,6] reveals that both P and C symmetries are violated to maximum in weak interactions

  • In 19641970, both CP and T are experimentally verified to be violated in some cases [7,8] whereas the product symmetry CPT holds intact to this day [9]

  • X1, t1; x2, t2 by three zero eigenvalues implies that the difference of a particle from its antiparticle is not something hiding in the “intrinsic space” like opposite charge or opposite strangeness but can be displayed in their WFs evolving in space-time at the level of QM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 1956-1957, the historical discovery of the parity violation [3,4,5,6] reveals that both P and C symmetries are violated to maximum in weak interactions. In 1965, Lee and Wu proposed that the definition of particle a versus its antiparticle a should be [13]. Way, the probability density is ensured to be positive definite for WFs of either particle or antiparticle. In the Appendix, the Klein paradox is solved for both KG equation and Dirac equation without resorting to the “hole theory”

What the K 0K 0 Correlation Experimental Data Are Telling?
E V 2 c2 p2 m2c4
The Proof of a Discrete Symmetry P for KG Particle
Reinterpretation of WF and the Relativistic Effects
Dirac Equation as Coupled Equations of Two-Component Spinors
The Strong Reflection Invariance in CPT Theorem and QFT
Why Dirac Equation Respects the Parity Symmetry?
D D 2
Tachyon Equation as a Counterpart of the Dirac Equation
Antigravity between Matter and Antimatter
10. Summary
11. Acknowledgements
V z 0 z 0 yielding:

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.