Abstract

High levels of meat consumption are increasingly being criticised for ethical, environmental and social reasons. Plant-based meat substitutes have been identified as healthy sources of protein that, in comparison to meat, offer a number of social, environmental and health benefits and may play a role in reducing meat consumption. However, there has been a lack of research on the role they can play in the policy agenda and how specific meat substitute attributes can influence consumers to partially replace meat in their diets. This paper is focused on consumers’ preferences for so-called meathybrid or plant-meathybrid products. In meathybrids, only a fraction of the meat product (e.g., 20% to 50%) is replaced with plant-based proteins. Research demonstrates that in many countries, consumers are highly attached to meat and consider it as an essential and integral element of their daily diet. For these consumers that are not interested in vegan or vegetarian alternatives as meat substitutes, meathybrids could be a low-threshold option for a more sustainable food consumption behaviour. In this paper, the results of an online survey with 500 German and 501 Belgian consumers are presented. The results show that more than fifty percent of consumers substitute meat at least occasionally. Thus, about half of the respondents reveal an eligible consumption behaviour with respect to sustainability and healthiness, at least sometimes. The applied discrete choice experiment demonstrated that the analysed meat products are the most preferred by consumers. Nonetheless, the tested meathybrid variants with different shares of plant-based proteins took the second position followed by the vegetarian-based alternatives. Therefore, meathybrids could facilitate the diet transition of meat-eaters in the direction toward a more healthy and sustainable consumption. The analysed consumer segment is more open-minded to the meathybrid concept in comparison to the vegetarian substitutes.

Highlights

  • There are more than 7.7 billion people on this planet, with forecasts predicting the population to grow to 9.7 billion by 2050 [1]

  • The results show that more than fifty percent of consumers substitute meat at least occasionally

  • Where x is a vector of predictors (e.g., Food Neophobia Scale (FNS), Meat Attachment Scale (MEAS) or buying frequency of organic meat) and β is a vector of model coefficients that are typically estimated by maximum likelihood

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There are more than 7.7 billion people on this planet, with forecasts predicting the population to grow to 9.7 billion by 2050 [1]. The consumption of meat and meat products in larger portions is associated with higher risk of cardiovascular, coronary and cerebrovascular diseases, stroke, diabetes type 2 and colorectal cancer [4] In addition to these health issues, meat production chains have a considerable impact on the environment through the use of land, the application of fertilisers, greenhouse emissions and water consumption, resulting in the loss of biodiversity and enhancing climate change [5,6,7,8]. Meathybrids could serve as a low-threshold offer for this group, facilitating the transition in the direction toward a more healthy and sustainable diet In this context, it has to be mentioned that consumer preferences are in particular affected by the products’ sensory characteristics. Based on a concise literature overview, a representative online survey was carried out in Germany and Belgium including a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) for four product categories (meat balls, chicken nuggets, salami, and mortadella)

Data Collection and Methods of Data Analysis
Discrete Choice Experiment and Experimental Design
Multinomial Logistic Regression
General Buying Behaviour
Meat Attachment Scale
Food Neophobia Scale
Health Scale
Consumption and Perception of Substitutes
Multinomial Logit Regression Analysis
Discussion and Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.