Abstract
In behavior-analytic studies of generalization, stimulus control appears to be discrete rather than continuous: after two behavior patterns R1 and R2 are trained in the presence of stimuli A and B, respectively, tests of intermediate stimuli evoke R1 and R2 in varying proportions rather than an actual mix of R1 and R2. By contrast, theories and data from developmental psychology suggest that spatial searches in the A-not-B sandbox task may be continuous: after burying an object at position A and then at position B, children may search the sand surface at positions that are actually intermediate between A and B. The published evidence so far has been ambiguous, however, because researchers typically report group means rather than response distributions, and group means intermediate between A and B might be statistical artefacts of averaging across subjects. Here we report two A-not-B sandbox studies designed to address this issue. In Experiment 1, which employed a purely motor A-not-B procedure, stimulus control was found to be continuous. In Experiment 2, which used a purely observational A-not-B procedure, stimulus control was basically discrete but also exhibited continuous aspects. These findings are discussed in relation to cognitive and behavior-analytic approaches to stimulus control.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.