Discrepancy between in-vitro and in-vivo inductions of differentiation by retinoids of human acute promyelocytic leukemia cells in relapse

Abstract

In-vitro studies of leukemic cells with retinoic acid and a therapeutic clinical trial with its derivative, etretinate, in a 58 yr-old male patient with 15;17 translocation-positive acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) in relapse are reported. Actinomycin D was used in combination. Bone marrow promyelocytes from the patient prior to etretinate and actinomycin D matured morphologically in the liquid culture with retinoic acid; 98% were matured myeloid cells after 6 days at a concentration of 10 −6 M of retinoic acid as compared with 2% of the control culture. Positive NBT reactions were seen in none of the cells in the latter but in 95% of the cells in the former. Actinomycin D, when added alone, only induced NBT positivity, but, when used in combination with retinoic acid, increased both NBT positivity and morphologically matured cells. The patient was treated daily with 2 μg/kg of actinomycin D (or 20 mg/m 2 or 33 mg/m 2 cytosine arabinoside after the 6th day) in 24-h infusions and per oral 90 mg/body of etretinate. No effectiveness was observed both morphologically and clinically. The patient expired 15 days after the initiation of etretinate. Thus, a discrepancy existed in the response of leukemic cells from this relapsed patient with APL to the in-vitro and in-vivo attempts to include differentiation by retinoids and actinomycin D.