Abstract

Deep-sea eukaryotic microorganisms play a vital role in degrading organic matter and geochemically cycling elements in the deep ocean. However, the impact of sampling methods on detection of these microorganisms under high hydrostatic pressure remains uncertain. In this study, we compared a traditional water sampling method using a Niskin bottle, an in situ microbial filtration and fixation method (ISMIFF), and a multiple in situ nucleic acid collection (MISNAC) method to exhibit differences in the community structures that were collected at ~590–3100 m in the South China Sea (SCS). The classification and biodiversity indices of 18S rDNA Illumina sequencing reads from the V9 variation region revealed higher diversity for MISNAC DNA absorption column samples compared to others. Importantly, the relative abundance of Ciliophora (19.49%), Copepoda (23.31%), and Diplonemea (10.67%) was higher in MISNAC adsorption column samples, while Retaria (48.86%) were dominant in the MISNAC membrane samples. This indicates that MISNAC columns might collect more DNA in situ for the naked protists, while Retaria with a carbonate shell were more likely retained on the membrane. In conclusion, MISNAC is an effective method for DNA collection of deep-sea eukaryotic microorganisms and provides valuable materials for studying deep-sea microbial ecosystems.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call