Abstract

Aims/hypothesisHere, we describe the characteristics of the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) Diabetes Research on Patient Stratification (DIRECT) epidemiological cohorts at baseline and follow-up examinations (18, 36 and 48 months of follow-up).MethodsFrom a sampling frame of 24,682 adults of European ancestry enrolled in population-based cohorts across Europe, participants at varying risk of glycaemic deterioration were identified using a risk prediction algorithm (based on age, BMI, waist circumference, use of antihypertensive medication, smoking status and parental history of type 2 diabetes) and enrolled into a prospective cohort study (n = 2127) (cohort 1, prediabetes risk). We also recruited people from clinical registries with type 2 diabetes diagnosed 6–24 months previously (n = 789) into a second cohort study (cohort 2, diabetes). Follow-up examinations took place at ~18 months (both cohorts) and at ~48 months (cohort 1) or ~36 months (cohort 2) after baseline examinations. The cohorts were studied in parallel using matched protocols across seven clinical centres in northern Europe.ResultsUsing ADA 2011 glycaemic categories, 33% (n = 693) of cohort 1 (prediabetes risk) had normal glucose regulation and 67% (n = 1419) had impaired glucose regulation. Seventy-six per cent of participants in cohort 1 was male. Cohort 1 participants had the following characteristics (mean ± SD) at baseline: age 62 (6.2) years; BMI 27.9 (4.0) kg/m2; fasting glucose 5.7 (0.6) mmol/l; 2 h glucose 5.9 (1.6) mmol/l. At the final follow-up examination the participants’ clinical characteristics were as follows: fasting glucose 6.0 (0.6) mmol/l; 2 h OGTT glucose 6.5 (2.0) mmol/l. In cohort 2 (diabetes), 66% (n = 517) were treated by lifestyle modification and 34% (n = 272) were treated with metformin plus lifestyle modification at enrolment. Fifty-eight per cent of participants in cohort 2 was male. Cohort 2 participants had the following characteristics at baseline: age 62 (8.1) years; BMI 30.5 (5.0) kg/m2; fasting glucose 7.2 (1.4) mmol/l; 2 h glucose 8.6 (2.8) mmol/l. At the final follow-up examination, the participants’ clinical characteristics were as follows: fasting glucose 7.9 (2.0) mmol/l; 2 h mixed-meal tolerance test glucose 9.9 (3.4) mmol/l.Conclusions/interpretationThe IMI DIRECT cohorts are intensely characterised, with a wide-variety of metabolically relevant measures assessed prospectively. We anticipate that the cohorts, made available through managed access, will provide a powerful resource for biomarker discovery, multivariate aetiological analyses and reclassification of patients for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Highlights

  • The global prevalence of type 2 diabetes is burgeoning

  • The rationale and design of the epidemiological cohorts within Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) Diabetes Research on Patient Stratification (DIRECT) are reported elsewhere [7]; here we provide data and information about key variables and methods, respectively, that were not described in the rationale and design paper published previously

  • Cohort 1 was stratified into two categories of blood glucose level: normal glucose regulation (NGR) and impaired glucose regulation (IGR)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The global prevalence of type 2 diabetes is burgeoning. There is no cure, nor are there treatments effective enough to halt the progression of the disease. The global cost of diagnosing and treating the disease and its complications in 2017 was estimated to be around €730 billion [1] This bleak picture emphasises the profound shortcomings in our understanding of type 2 diabetes aetiology and pathogenesis, and the inadequate tools available with which to combat the disease. The risk conveyed by established diabetogenic factors such as obesity, physical inactivity and certain dietary components varies widely from one person to the as does the response to interventions targeting these risk factors. This is true for those in whom diabetes is manifest, with response to glucose-lowering therapies, occurrence of adverse events and rates of progression being variable and hard to predict

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call