Abstract
It is well established that active learning results in greater gains in student conceptual knowledge and retention compared to traditional modes of learning. However, active learning can be very difficult to implement in a large-enrollment course due to various course and institutional barriers. Herein, we describe the development and implementation of Discovery Learning, a novel active learning discussion/recitation for a large enrollment general chemistry course. Drawing on the very successful cooperative learning pedagogies Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) and Student-Centered Active Learning Environment with Upside-down Pedagogies (SCALE_UP), Discovery Learning involves students working in self-managed teams on inquiry problems in a unique learning environment, the Chemistry Discovery Center. In this case study, we will describe the design and implementation of Discovery Learning and report data on its successes, which include increased student performance and retention.
Highlights
Active learning has been shown to be effective across all STEM disciplines and class sizes, the greatest impact is in courses with fewer than 50 students (Freeman et al, 2014)
Discovery Learning involves students working in small groups with defined roles on guided inquiry activities in a unique learning environment, the Chemistry Discovery Center
These skills, in turn, help students to better grasp conceptual knowledge associated with general chemistry, clarify misconceptions, and likely contribute to students performing better in the course
Summary
Active learning has been shown to be effective across all STEM disciplines and class sizes, the greatest impact is in courses with fewer than 50 students (Freeman et al, 2014). Discovery Learning involves students working in small groups with defined roles on guided inquiry activities in a unique learning environment, the Chemistry Discovery Center. A review of institutional records revealed that the implementation of Discovery Learning resulted in an increased one-year retention of majors within the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry (Table 2).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.