Abstract

Glacier velocity is one of the important parameters to know about glacier dynamics, its mass and health. Understanding glacier velocity also assists in the analysis of ice thickness, ice flux and mass balance. Furthermore, basin/sub-basin wise studies are helpful to understand the climate change over that region instead of monitoring individual glaciers. In the current study, the spatial distribution of glacier velocity is generated for the entire Chandra and Bhaga sub-basins, in the Lahaul-Spiti district of Himachal Pradesh, India, using Advanced Land Observing Satellite-2/Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar-2 (ALOS-2/PALSAR-2) differential interferometry pair images with a 14-days temporal gap. The glaciers in Chandra sub-basin are found to have a high flow rate as compared to the glaciers in Bhaga sub-basin. Local slope and ice thickness, which decrease towards the terminus in general, control the movement of valley glaciers, and lower movement rate is observed for most of glaciers towards the terminus/frontal area. However, a few glaciers of Bhaga sub-basin demonstrate an accelerated movement in their frontal areas. This irregular behaviour is also studied in this work and it is discovered that terrain slope and influx of melting water from adjacent glaciers are the major causes for such behaviour of these glaciers. They are, therefore, prone to accelerated mass loss compared to other glaciers in the sub-basin. Another key finding of the anomalous glacier dynamics study is the disintegrating behaviour of glaciers, which is also identified by interpreting the responses of physical scattering mechanisms retrieved from glaciers using fully polarimetric ALOS-2/PALSAR-2. Warming temperatures are expected to cause glacier retreat and separation of tributary glaciers from the main glacier body. Melt water from tributary glaciers can further accelerate glacier flow and ice melt in lower part of glacier trunk. This can lead to formation of dead ice zones and disintegration of Himalayan glaciers, which are supported by numerous tributary glaciers. Therefore, we expect that the loss in glacier area due to warming will be larger than the present prediction, where mass loss is considered from conventional way.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.