Abstract
In this paper I intend to examine the fiqh rulings concerning women and the marital relations in the Mamlūk age (1250–1517 AD). However, fiqh manuals cannot adequately portray the reality of women and the marital relationship. They are complex, multifaceted and contextual; they were in a constant state of negotiation with social, political, and economic factors. To contest the authoritativeness of these legal texts, I will juxtapose the legal sources with non‑legal texts. I will consult historical and literary texts, biographical dictionaries, adab literature and poetry, assessing them in comparison to the legal manuals. Looking into the various genres and sources one will clearly realize that there were different pertinent discourses that were all standing side by side, and none of them may claim exclusive validity. It is not possible to resolve the contradiction and ambiguity in the sources regarding the perplexing marital relations. However, I hope that through a combination of historical‑critical research, literary and textual analysis as well as an understanding of the methods and goals of the producers of texts, one can reach a better understanding of the marital relations in the Mamlūk Age.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.