Abstract

The research presented in this paper collects and analyses a set of documents disseminating discourse on artistic research in Flanders – the Northern, Dutch-speaking region of Belgium. In doing so, it identifies hegemonic constructions structuring the (im)possibility of fostering fruitful interlinkages between the often-dichotomised notions of ‘art’ and ‘science’. Hinged on the officialisation of the first Flemish doctoral degrees in the arts, the study points to earlier, ‘inclusive’ discourses on artistic research that allowed articulating a variety of activities and outcomes as ‘research’. The introduction of the PhD gave way to ‘exclusive’ discourses that restrict artistic research to the higher arts education context. Notably, these ‘exclusive discourses’ – often disseminated by higher art educators – are expressively critical of the research agenda. Highlighting its artificial origins in the Bologna Process, artistic research is normatively constructed as an infringement on the arts’ autonomy. Its potential is not denied altogether, however, but only touched upon in cryptonormative terms that reject current conditions without addressing what it should or could be.

Highlights

  • In Western Europe, formal interaction between ‘the arts’ and ‘research’ commenced with the 1999 onset of the Bologna Process – a supranational effort to harmonise the fragmented European higher education sector (Lesage, 2009; Hellström, 2010; Wesseling, 2011; Biggs & Karlsson, 2011 Borgdorff, 2012)

  • Scholars working on artistic research (e.g. Hannula, 2009; Borgdorff, 2012) and artists/researchers whose practice situates their work in artistic research (e.g. Impett, 2017; De Assis & Giudici, 2017) recognise this dimension of generative productivity

  • Artistic research is an institutional and material reality – with increasing numbers of professional artists perfecting their practice through research

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In Western Europe, formal interaction between ‘the arts’ and ‘research’ commenced with the 1999 onset of the Bologna Process – a supranational effort to harmonise the fragmented European higher education sector (Lesage, 2009; Hellström, 2010; Wesseling, 2011; Biggs & Karlsson, 2011 Borgdorff, 2012). By focusing on the ‘Flemish public debate on artistic research’, this paper is less concerned with Flemish artistic research proper – like practitioners or outcomes – and more with (public) claims about it This is a reduction of its inherent complexity, but exploring one particular dimension to a discursive system generates valuable insights if properly delineated (Keller, 2011). Keywords were queried in FRIS [Flanders Research Information Space] – the database collecting Flemish research output, including from popular sources This indicated that relevant non-peer reviewed publications were either published in De Witte Raaf [DWR], Rekto:Verso [RV] – two journals dedicated to arts and culture – or were contributions to newspapers. This corresponds to the initiation of the Bologna Process (i.e. 1999) to the present

These are
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call