Abstract
The debate over whether STEM education is worth promoting has always been an essential theme in research. There are differences in the perceptions of different subjects on this issue, but the current research is analyzed more from a single perspective. In virtual dialogue, this study constructs multiple rounds of dialogue among multi-interested subjects, focusing on the perceptions, consensus, and disagreement of the nature and dilemmas of STEM education, and their attitudes towards STEM education. It is found that the four subjects of interest, school administrators, teachers, parents, and out-of-school institutions, have a high consistency in many aspects of their perceptions. Still, there are also cognitive conflicts in some areas or more dispersed perspectives. In addition, they present differentiated attitudes and behaviors at the three levels of acceptance, commitment, and expectation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
