Abstract
Despite being internally fragmented by clashes of paradigms, sociology textbooks and introductory courses show a remarkable similarity in their content, while they share a peculiar neglect of small scale societies, non-human social relations, as well as evolutionary explanations. The mistreatment is explained by the strong position of sociology in the nature vs. nurture debate, by paradigmatic and ideologically motivated condemnations, by the later misuse of Social Darwinism, by certain unresolved issues of evolutionary explanations of human sociality, and by epistemological critiques of evolutionary explanations. The current study assesses the extent of this avoidance in sociology by three methods: a review of major sociology textbooks, a descriptive quantitative text analysis of introductory course outlines at top ranked universities, and a keyword search in the all-time most emblematic classical books in sociology. In reaction to this mistreatment, the benefits of synthesis of sociological explanations with evolutionary thinking are discussed.
Highlights
This study analyzes the inclusive or exclusive standpoint of sociology concerning human evolution
The current study provided an overview on the stance of sociology on evolutionary explanations
As a better way to synthesis, evolutionary thinking needs to be integrated into sociology
Summary
This study analyzes the inclusive or exclusive standpoint of sociology concerning human evolution. It is important to note that just as primer textbooks, introductory sociology courses are almost necessarily introvert They create boundaries around what is primarily considered as sociological and their role is not to provide a comprehensive view on human sociality. Common in all representations is the relatively large distance between sociology and social studies on the one hand; and animal behavior, evolutionary biology, and sociobiology on the other hand (see Klavans and Boyack, 2006, 2007; Boyack et al, 2007; Bollen et al, 2009; Börner, 2010; Rafols et al, 2010 for more maps of science underlying this claim)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have