Abstract

Osteoporosis leads to excessive bone resorption which is not accompanied by equal amount of bone formation. PTH (1-34) forms the mainstay of bone anabolic therapy. Intermittent PTH (iPTH) has the ability to reconstruct skeleton, a property not shared by other anti-resorptives. In initial phases of PTH treatment, bone formation exceeds bone resorption. However, gradually this phase is replaced by increased bone resorption. Thus, a replacement post PTH discontinuation is much needed. Studies with bisphosphonates and Denosumab post PTH withdrawal have yielded promising but variable results. Thus, there is scope for trying new combinations. Our previous studies have shown the superior skeletal effects of neutralizing IL17 antibody (NIL17) over anti-RANKL antibody. Thus, here we investigated if sequential treatment of NIL17 after PTH withdrawal (SHIFT) could serve as a promising therapeutic approach for osteoporosis treatment. Our results show that PTH withdrawal (PTH-W) led to mitigation of its anabolic effects as evidenced by reduced BMD, bone trabecular and cortical microarchitectural parameters. In the continuous PTH (PTH-C) and the Shift group, all these parameters were preserved as par with the sham group. Shift therapy also significantly increased PINP levels. Most importantly, serum CTX-I levels and osteoclast numbers, which were elevated in PTH groups were significantly suppressed in NIL17 monotherapy and shift group. Also, expression of FOXO1 and ATF-4, the main regulators of redox balance and function in osteoblasts, were found to be enhanced maximally in the sequential therapy group. Our study thus advocates use of NIL17 as a replacement therapeutic option post PTH discontinuation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call