Disclosure practices of foreign and domestic firms in Australia

Abstract

Even while straddling the global economy, multinational corporations (MNCs) need to adapt to different institutional regimes in host country markets in which they operate. This research examines the extent to which MNC-subsidiaries are embedded in their local institutional context in terms of how they pursue local legitimacy and respond to local laws and standards of disclosure of executive remuneration in the host country. Drawing attention to key socio-economic influences on foreign MNC-subsidiaries, we examine whether global MNCs respond to disclosure requirements in a host country and address a higher level of information asymmetry associated with multinational operations. The analysis of disclosure levels of MNC-subsidiaries vis-à-vis domestic firms suggests that, other things being equal, MNCs are more responsive to increased disclosure requirements than their local counterparts if they have substantial economic interactions with domestic product-markets. These results demonstrate that MNCs are willing to incur the marginal cost of increasing disclosure if commensurate benefits justify it. Another interesting finding relates to the negative association between legal system type (common law) of MNC's parent country and disclosure level of director and executive remuneration. It highlights that MNC-subsidiaries with higher regulatory (institutional) distance disclose better level of remuneration to gain external legitimacy and reduce their liability of foreignness.