Abstract

The validation of a computational fluid dynamics model for a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) is normally conducted by the experimental I–V performance curve. However, it seems this method is not solid enough. In the meantime, it's difficult to conduct the item-to-item quantitative comparisons between the internal distributions acquired from numerical and testing results. Therefore, in this paper, as the first attempt, qualitative comparisons between the modeling and experimental results are conducted based on the three important parameters of an air-cooled PEMFC (air stoichiometric ratio, air relative humidity, cathode flow field design) to explore the trends of the related fuel cell I–V performance curves and internal resistances. The internal resistances are tested using the EIS technique and differentiated by an equivalent circuit model. Conclusions show that the qualitative comparisons between the numerical and testing results support each other well and new results are found based on the comparisons. Finally, discussions on the sensitivity based on the experimental EIS results are conducted to explore the response degree of the total resistance to the air stoichiometric ratio, the air relative humidity and the cathode flow field design.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.