Abstract
In the latest request for a preliminary ruling raised by a UK tribunal in the Fenix case (not yet decided), the First-tier Tribunal asked the ECJ whether article 9a of Council Implementing Regulation 282/2011 regarding the qualification of portals and platforms as undisclosed agents was going beyond the scope of article 28 of the VAT Directive. For the first time, the ECJ will have to clarify when an intermediary is a disclosed agent (acting in the name of another person) or an undisclosed agent (acting in its own name).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
