Disciplinary Safeguards for Faculty Members In Palestinian Universities: A Comparative Analytical Study of the Arab American University

Abstract

Objectives: The main focus of this study is to provide an in-depth analysis of the disciplinary safeguards in place for faculty members at Arab American University and other higher education institutions. The research seeks to identify and highlight specific shortcomings and weaknesses in the current system, while also proposing practical solutions and recommendations to rectify these issues. Ultimately, the aim of this research is to promote a well-functioning educational system that prioritises the job security and well-being of all educators. Methods: Our study utilises a descriptive, analytical, and comparative approach in examining the disciplinary guarantees of faculty members at Arab American University and comparing them to other institutions of higher education. Results: The results showed that it was prohibited to impose any penalty, except after the investigation. In addition, the First Instance and Appeal Disciplinary Board at the Arab American University should be formed by the Deans’ Council. Moreover, the system does not require the presence of a member of the Faculty of Law in the disciplinary councils. Conclusion: It is concluded that faculty members in higher education institutions hold a critical role in society as they serve as the foundation of the educational process. However, these esteemed professionals may occasionally make mistakes, which require accountability. In such instances, it is essential to ensure that any disciplinary measures are fair, just, and transparent. Such measures will not only maintain psychological stability but also establish trust between faculty members and the university administration.