Abstract

Upward diffusion of dissolved methane and associated anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) coupled with microbial sulfate reduction (MSR) are widespread in normal hemipelagic sediments of continental margins. The occurrence of authigenic sulfur enrichment in such sediments is usually regarded as an indicator of AOM; however, extensive MSR and authigenic iron sulfide generation also occur in turbidites. Therefore, research attention should be directed toward determining the geochemical features of authigenic sulfur mineralization in methane-rich background sediments and turbidites. Here we report the sedimentology and geochemical composition of sediments from four piston cores (CL30, CL44, CL47, and CL3A) containing turbidite layers from methane-rich areas of the South China Sea. The turbidite layers were deposited at 17–15 kyr BP or earlier during the last glacial period and were located above the present sulfate–methane transition zone (SMTZ). The median grain size, proportion of sand-sized grains, and Si, Ti, K, and Zr contents show marked elevation in the turbidite layers compared with the background sediments, indicating the input of large amounts of terrigenous detrital matter with coarser grains. High total sulfur (TS) contents and low δ34SAIS values (AIS: acid-insoluble sulfur) (−35.2‰ to −26.1‰) are observed within turbidite layers relative to the background hemipelagic sediments in core CL44. These results suggest that intensive sulfidization occurred as a result of enhanced organoclastic sulfate reduction rates in turbidite horizons, which were probably caused by the resultant decrease in downward oxygen flux and waning bioturbation after rapid deposition of turbidites. In comparison, TS contents are higher and δ34SAIS values are positive (0.2‰–46.8‰) within the SMTZ on account of the rapid consumption of sulfate and build-up of isotopically heavier hydrogen sulfide pools via intensive AOM. Moreover, authigenic barium (Ba) enrichments commonly occur in the depth interval immediately above the SMTZ rather than within turbidite layers; therefore, they serve as a useful indicator of the position of the SMTZ. This study presents distinct differences in the geochemical compositions of turbidity deposits and methane-rich background sediments and highlights that a multi-proxy approach including sedimentological and geochemical analyses should be used to constrain the types of MSR in deep-sea sediments, given the common occurrence of turbidites and subsurface methane release in marginal deep-sea areas. It is also suggested that if applied with caution, S–C–Ba geochemical patterns can be used to identify palaeo-SMTZs and palaeo methane-rich zones in turbidite-containing strata.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call