Abstract

Occupational segregation is a fundamental cause of structural inequality within the labor market, but it remains under-researched in the case of disability status. Using 2011 American Community Survey data for working-age adults, we examine the representation of persons with different types of disabilities across occupations and industries. We find that employed workers with disabilities experience occupational segregation that limits their earnings potential. People with disabilities tend to work in lower-skilled jobs with limited educational and experience requirements. However, these disparities also vary by the nature of a person's disability, which perpetuates inequality by disability status. Although supply-side, human capital variables play a role in shaping earnings, we find that these broader, structural factors and occupational characteristics strongly influence the economic wellbeing of people with disabilities.

Highlights

  • The 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) aimed to improve employment and earnings opportunities for people with disabilities by removing barriers and outlawing discrimination on the basis of disability in the private sector

  • We found that employed workers with disabilities experienced segregation across occupations and industries, which in turn limited their earnings potential

  • Supply-side, human capital variables played a role in shaping representation and earnings, we found that broader, structural factors strongly influenced the economic wellbeing of people with disabilities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) aimed to improve employment and earnings opportunities for people with disabilities by removing barriers and outlawing discrimination on the basis of disability in the private sector. Explanations range from general criticisms of the capitalist system and economic downturns to institutional and policy failures (Acemoglu & Angrist, 2001; Colker & Milani, 2010; DeLeire, 1995; Lee, 2003; O’Brien, 2001; Russell, 2002) They refer to workers’ dependence on social welfare and disability benefits (Acemoglu & Angrist, 2001; Weidenbaum, 1994), the nature of work (Beegle & Stock, 2003; Jones & Sloane, 2010), and employer attitudes

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call