Abstract

In recent years the Inter-American Human Rights System has moved in the direction of increasingly protecting the rights of persons with disabilities. Although the Inter-American singular instrument dealing with disability rights (CIADDIS) does not provide a strong tool for the analysis of individual claims in cases of violations of these rights, both the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights have relied on an expansive interpretation of the Inter-American treaties, particularly the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR), in order to protect them. The purpose of this article is to trace the evolution of Inter-American jurisprudence and practice with regard to the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities. In its first decisions on persons with disabilities, the Inter-American System took a general approach by simply recognising that persons with disabilities are entitled to the same rights as all persons; in its more recent decisions the Inter-American System has taken a proactive approach by interpreting those rights from a particular disability rights perspective. This article will argue that in doing so, the Inter-American System has, in some aspects, progressively caught up with international standards of protection regarding disability rights, while in others, it has developed a particular standard of interpretation that is in conflict with the CRPD’s standards. Inter-American jurisprudence is thus slowly becoming an internationally relevant actor for the interpretation of disability rights, one that should be taken into account.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call