Abstract
Paralympians’ participation in the Olympic Games is marked by intense debate. To evaluate disabilities, we should avoid literal definitions and rather consider the diverse factors that may influence a person’s functions and functionality. This article analyses two cases of disabled athletes: Oscar Pistorius and Alan Fonteles. We understand that, if an athlete, despite of any disability, feels he or she is able to compete with others, this athlete should not be prohibited to do so. Moreover, without scientific evidence that an athlete has advantages over others, people with disabilities should be allowed to participate in any championship.
Highlights
Disabilities in sports have been in the spotlight since the beginning of the 20th century
People who participate in disabled sports competitions are seen as athletes and as disabled people[1]
Oscar Pistorius was present in the London 2012 Games in both the Olympic and Paralympic competitions[5] and is probably the most famous athlete to have done so
Summary
Lucas André Borato[1], Carlos Bandeira de Mello Monteiro[1], Deisy de Freitas Lima Ventura[1], Marcelo Massa[1]. ABSTRACT: Paralympians’ participation in the Olympic Games is marked by intense debate. We should avoid literal definitions and rather consider the diverse factors that may influence a person’s functions and functionality. This article analyses two cases of disabled athletes: Oscar Pistorius and Alan Fonteles. If an athlete, despite of any disability, feels he or she is able to compete with others, this athlete should not be prohibited to do so. Without scientific evidence that an athlete has advantages over others, people with disabilities should be allowed to participate in any championship. Ética & Justiça. 2019;24(1):[44-7]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
