Abstract

Using hand-collected data around the first-time disclosure of directors’ ownership in U.S. mutual funds in 2002 as mandated by the SEC, I provide empirical evidence that investors value such ownership as a commitment to diligent monitoring. Flows into individual mutual funds following the disclosure are positively related to directors’ ownership, and various tests show that the flow response is unlikely a result of unobserved fund heterogeneity. Flows are more responsive to independent directors’ ownership than to interested directors’ ownership. Finally, directors’ ownership, as a governance mechanism, is particularly valued in those funds that lack alternative monitoring mechanisms, such as the presence of institutional investors.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call