Abstract

Apparent motion stimulus induces visual perception of smooth motion even though there is no speed information. We examined whether human brain response as measured by magnetoencephalography carries direction information in the visually presented apparent motion of a randomdot pattern in a similar manner as continuous motions that have speed and direction information. Although there was no significant effect of motion direction on the peak response latency and amplitude, mutual information entropy (IE) significantly increased after the motion onset at approximately 36 ms after the response latency in 41% of the evaluations. Detailed analysis of the data from five subjects who participated in both the present apparent motion and our previous coherent motion studies revealed that the maximum IE latency (delay) for apparent motion was significantly longer than that for coherent motion, although the mean maximum IE was the same. The results indicate that direction is represented in the response waveform evoked by apparent motion but the manner is different from that for coherent motion probably due to the distinct neural processes engaged only for the apparent motion perception. We consider that direction and speed can be processed separately in the human brain because direction information was generated without speed information for the perception of apparent motion.

Highlights

  • Humans visually perceive motion of objects even when the objects do not move but change their positions discontinuously

  • The peak response amplitude (20 to 30 fT/cm) and latency (160 to 170 ms) data for the apparent motion (Figure 1) were similar to those for the coherent motions noted in our previous studies [8]

  • The results were rather surprising considering the stimulus durations: the coherent motions were presented for 0.5 s but the apparent motion stimulus was the frame change in 16.7 ms because the refresh rate was 60 Hz

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Humans visually perceive motion of objects even when the objects do not move but change their positions discontinuously. The neural process underlying such apparent motion perception must be different from that for the real motions, because human brains create vivid images of the path of the apparent motion that do not exist and cannot not be seen [1,2,3]. Apparent motion stimulus is inherently ambiguous; subtle changes in the stimulus conditions, such as presentation timing and distance of the position change, could induce quite different perceptions. Human brains must determine what happened from the two possibilities such as motion or blink. Such neural processes would not be engaged in motion perception induced by continuous motion stimulus

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call