Direction and distance information in memory for locations of objects relative to landmarks and boundaries.

Abstract

An observer often remembers an object's location on the basis of its direction and distance from reference objects. Two kinds of reference object are of particular interest: landmarks and boundaries. We compared how well observers remembered the direction and distance of target objects from a landmark and a boundary. Patterns of variable error implied that the landmark was more effective than the boundary in supporting memory for target object direction. When the predictions of the landmark and the boundary were placed in conflict, patterns of constant error implied that the boundary was more effective than the landmark in supporting memory for target object distance. These results suggest affinities between direction information and landmarks and between distance information and boundaries. They raise the possibility that, rather than collapsing across direction and distance error, theoretical analyses should distinguish the two kinds of error in assessing the reliability of landmarks and boundaries.