Abstract

Spatial attention enables us to enhance the processing of items at target locations, at the expense of items presented at irrelevant locations. Many studies have explored the neural correlates of these spatial biases using event-related potentials (ERPs). More recently some studies have shown that these ERP correlates are also present when subjects search visual short-term memory (VSTM). This suggests firstly that this type of mental representation retains a spatial organization that is based upon that of the original percept, and secondly that these attentional biases are flexible and can act to modulate remembered as well as perceptual representations. We aimed to test whether it was necessary for subjects to have actually seen the memoranda at those spatial locations, or whether simply imagining the spatial layout was sufficient to elicit the spatial attention effects. On some trials subjects performed a “visual” search of an array held in VSTM, and upon other trials subjects imagined the items at those spatial locations. We found ERP markers of spatial attention in both the memory-search and the imagery-search conditions. However, there were differences between the conditions, the effect in the memory-search began earlier and included posterior electrode sites. By contrast the ERP effect in the imagery-search condition was apparent only over fronto-central electrode sites and emerged slightly later. Nonetheless, our data demonstrate that it is not necessary for subjects to have ever seen the items at spatial locations for neural markers of spatial attention to be elicited; searching an imaginary spatial layout also triggers spatially-specific attention effects in the ERP data.

Highlights

  • Spatial attention enables us to bias incoming sensory information, in favor of that which is relevant to the task at hand (Posner, 1980)

  • These mental representations appear to retain something of the spatial layout of their original sensory antecedents (Harrison and Tong, 2009); similar spatial attention mechanisms can operate upon these visual short-term memory (VSTM) representations as those that operate on sensory input (Kuo et al, 2009)

  • There are a number of other spatially-specific event-related potentials (ERPs) components that are evident in the early visual response, and which are thought to index the deployment of spatial attention processes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spatial attention enables us to bias incoming sensory information, in favor of that which is relevant to the task at hand (Posner, 1980). Because of the contralateral organization of the human visual system, as subjects covertly search their sensory input for the target, waveforms recorded contra and ipsilateral to the spatial location of that target diverge One such ERP effect is called the N2pc (Luck and Hillyard, 1994)—a relative negativity over the posterior scalp contralateral to the location of the stimulus, apparent between 180 and 300 ms following the onset of the search array (Jolicoeur et al, 2006, 2008; Eimer and Kiss, 2008, 2010a; Astle et al, 2009b). The anterior directing attention negativity (ADAN) occurs over fronto-central sites between 300 and 500 ms after cue Frontiers in Human Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.