Directed graph mapping is able to distinguish between the true and false rotors in a complex in-silico excitation pattern

Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): Supported in part by Dirección General de Polı́tica Cientı́fica de la Generalitat Valenciana PROMETEU 2020/043 Background In realistic in-silico studies (Figure1, top row) it was shown that phase mapping PM (Figure 1, A) can detect the correct rotor as well as phantom rotors as an artefact of interpolation or due to the far field (Figure 1, B). After interpretation of the LAT, the far field detections could not be distinguished from the true rotor driving the excitation pattern. This can contribute to failure in Atrial Fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures. Objective We tested if the recently developed tool Directed Graph mapping (DGM) is less prone to far-field effects and interpolation artefacts than PM on the same in-silico data. DGM represents the excitation pattern as a directed network, from which the rotational activity is detected as cycles in that network. Methods Starting from the electrograms (EGMs) of the 64 electrode basket catheter, we interpolated to 957 equidistant electrodes and calculated local activation times (LATs) of the interpolated EGMs (Figure 1, C). We varied the minimal allowed conduction velocity and calculated the corresponding networks for the complete simulation time. Detections were considered as correct if they were located in the same region of the true core of the phasemaps. The false detections were classified in multiple different regions (Figure 1, D). Results We find that by proper choice of CVs in the graphs it is possible to achieve a 80% detection of true rotors with 26% detection of false rotors. Reducing restrictions on the CVs increased the detection rate of the false rotors. False rotors due to artifacts were not detected by DGM (Figure 1, last row). Conclusion DGM is able to distinguish between true and far field rotors. False detections due to interpolation artifacts as seen in the PM protocol were not observed. The velocity limits in the graph construction play a keyrole in eliminating the far field effects. Abstract Figure 1