Abstract
Radical empiricists at the turn of the twentieth century described organisms as experiencing the relations they maintain with their surroundings prior to any analytic separation from their environment. They notably avoided separating perception of the material environment from social life. This perspective on perceptual experience was to prove the inspiration for Gibson’s ecological approach to perceptual psychology. Gibson provided a theory of how the direct perception of the organism-environment relation is possible. Central to his account was the notion of a medium for direct perception. However Gibson provided two mutually inconsistent accounts of the medium leading to problems for his radical empiricism. We develop an account of the medium that does justice to ecological psychology’s radical empiricist roots. To complement this account of the medium we detail a usage-based account of information. Together they allow us to propose a novel radical empiricist view of direct perception. We then return to the notion of medium and expand it to include sociomaterial practices. We show how direct perception happens in the midst of social life, and is made possible by an active achieving and maintaining of a pragmatic relation with the environment.
Highlights
In the radical empiricist philosophy of the early twentieth century perception is understood as a relational, world-involving activity (James 1912)
Harry Heft convincingly showed in his book ‘Ecological psychology in context’ (2001; see Heft 2017) that the legacy of radical empiricism was continued by James Gibson in his theory of direct perception (Gibson 1966, 1979)
In order to account for direct perception in ways consistent with radical empiricism we’ve developed the notion of ‘medium’ in ecological psychology
Summary
In the radical empiricist philosophy of the early twentieth century perception is understood as a relational, world-involving activity (James 1912). The tension relates to whether the environment should be understood as made up of ready-made structure, or whether activity always has a constitutive role to play in structuring the environment It has consequences for thinking about the role of social life, language, and the commitment to realism in an ecological account of perception (Heft 1989; 2017; Ingold 2011; Costall 1995; Turvey 1992; Rietveld and Kiverstein 2014; Vaz 2015; Van Dijk and Myin 2018; Baggs and Chemero 2018; Heras-Escribano 2019). We go on to show how given this usage-based account of information, the activity-related view of the medium allows for an expanded notion of the environment to include sociomaterial practices.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.