Abstract

The current mainstay for the treatment of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is under debate. We aimed to assess whether DOACs would be safe in APS patients presenting to the thrombosis clinic. A retrospective cohort study was conducted. All patients presenting to our thrombosis clinic between 2010 and 2017 with a diagnosis of APS taking either VKAs or DOACs were included. APS diagnosis was based on the revised Sapporo criteria. Clinical and laboratory data were collected from the electronic and physical patient files. Out of 200 patients, 81 received VKAs, and 119 DOACs. The two cohorts did not differ with regard to their initial clinical manifestation or additional prothrombotic risk factors. Only a small minority of patients was antiphospholipid antibody triple positive (VKA, 7.0% vs. DOAC, 4.2%). Numberofon-treatment events was low (3 vs. 2). The hazard ratio for any thromboembolic event for patients taking DOACs was 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.12-5.19). Treatment with DOACs was not associated with an increased risk of recurrent thromboembolism in comparison with VKAs in this retrospective study. Our observation supports the assumption that in nontriple positive (low risk) APS patients, DOACs might be safe. Prospective data are urgently needed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.