Abstract

In order to simulate compressible shear flow stability and aeroacoustic problems, a numerical code must be able to capture how a baseflow behaves when submitted to small disturbances. If the disturbances are amplified, the flow is unstable. The linear stability theory (LST) provides a framework to obtain information about the growth rate in relation to the excitation frequency for a given baseflow. A linear direct numerical simulation (DNS) should capture the same growth rate as the LST, providing a severe test for the code. In the present study, DNS simulations of a two-dimensional compressible mixing layer and of a two-dimensional compressible plane jet are performed. Disturbances are introduced at the domain inflow and spatial growth rates obtained with a DNS code are compared with growth rates obtained from LST analyses, for each baseflow, in order to verify and validate the DNS code. The good comparison between DNS simulations and LST results indicates that the code is able to simulate compressible flow problems and it is possible to use it to perform numerical simulation of instability and aeroacoustic problems.

Highlights

  • There is an increasing concern about noise-related health problems in many engineering areas

  • linear stability theory (LST) analysis was used to obtain the frequency with spatial growth rate and the corresponding eigenfunctions are introduced as disturbances at the simulation inflow boundary

  • Since direct numerical simulation (DNS) results have these three distinct regions, where the linear region may be contaminated by the overlap of the initial transient and the nonlinear regions, it was decided to compare the maximum amplitude of the normal velocity with the amplitude predicted by the LST theory, instead of the amplification rates

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is an increasing concern about noise-related health problems in many engineering areas. LST analysis was used to obtain the frequency with spatial growth rate and the corresponding eigenfunctions are introduced as disturbances at the simulation inflow boundary.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call