Abstract
The number of agents normally plays an important role in markets, with larger markets implying less market power of single agents and thus more efficiency. This conjecture is investigated in the case of small and medium sized matching markets with negotiations over the distribution of profits. In addition to efficiency rates, possible differences between a 2x2 and 6x6 matching market are tested. A slight but not substantial increase in efficiency with market size is observed. In both markets the resulting allocations are driven by social motives and do not show differences in negotiated profits, number of equal splits, or proportion of core solutions. The observed results are independent of market size and thus seem not to be influenced by the number of possible partners. In both markets repeated direct one-on-one negotiations evoke strong emotions. JEL classification: C78, C91, D63, D86, J21
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.