Abstract

ABSTRACTSeafloor networks of cables, pipelines, and other infrastructure underpin our daily lives, providing communication links, information, and energy supplies. Despite their global importance, these networks are vulnerable to damage by a number of natural seafloor hazards, including landslides, turbidity currents, fluid flow, and scour. Conventional geophysical techniques, such as high‐resolution reflection seismic and side‐scan sonar, are commonly employed in geohazard assessments. These conventional tools provide essential information for route planning and design; however, such surveys provide only indirect evidence of past processes and do not observe or measure the geohazard itself. As such, many numerical‐based impact models lack field‐scale calibration, and much uncertainty exists about the triggers, nature, and frequency of deep‐water geohazards. Recent advances in technology now enable a step change in their understanding through direct monitoring. We outline some emerging monitoring tools and how they can quantify key parameters for deep‐water geohazard assessment. Repeat seafloor surveys in dynamic areas show that solely relying on evidence from past deposits can lead to an under‐representation of the geohazard events. Acoustic Doppler current profiling provides new insights into the structure of turbidity currents, whereas instrumented mobile sensors record the nature of movement at the base of those flows for the first time. Existing and bespoke cabled networks enable high bandwidth, low power, and distributed measurements of parameters such as strain across large areas of seafloor. These techniques provide valuable new measurements that will improve geohazard assessments and should be deployed in a complementary manner alongside conventional geophysical tools.

Highlights

  • Subsea infrastructure networks underpin our daily lives, providing critical global communication links and supporting our demand for energy supplies

  • MARINE GEOHAZARDS AND CONVENTIONAL ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES A number of processes can constitute a marine geohazard, but here, we focus on (i) submarine landslides, (ii) turbidity currents, (iii) scour and seafloor sediment mobility, and (iv) sub-surface fluid flow and seafloor expulsion

  • Advances in technologies that have been tested in relatively shallow water enable a new wave of direct monitoring for marine geohazards in deep water

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Subsea infrastructure networks underpin our daily lives, providing critical global communication links and supporting our demand for energy supplies. Direct monitoring tools can address key uncertainties for geohazard assessment, including repeat surveys, water column imaging, acoustic Doppler current profiling, mobile seafloor devices, and cabled networks. A shore-based broadband seismic network in Taiwan that was designed to monitor terrestrial landslide activity recorded up to 52 offshore seismic events, interpreted to relate to slope failures that occurred in or near the submarine Gaoping Canyon (Lin et al 2010) If this method can be validated, it should provide a useful tool for future hazard assessment for the dense networks of offshore infrastructure in the region around Taiwan.

Findings
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call