Abstract

Ionizing radiation from Computed tomography (CT) examinations and the associated health risks are growing concerns. The purpose of this study was to directly measure individual organ doses during routine clinical CT scanning protocols and to evaluate how these measurements vary with scanning conditions. Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters were surgically implanted into individual organs of fresh non-embalmed whole-body cadavers. Whole-body, head, chest, and abdomen CT scans were taken of 6 cadavers by simulating common clinical methods. The dosimeters were extracted and the radiation exposure doses for each organ were calculated. Average values were used for analysis. Measured individual organ doses for whole-body routine CT protocol were less than 20 mGy for all organs. The measured doses of surface/shallow organs were higher than those of deep organs under the same irradiation conditions. At the same tube voltage and tube current, all internal organ doses were significantly higher for whole-body scans compared with abdominal scans. This study could provide valuable information on individual organ doses and their trends under various scanning conditions. These data could be referenced and used when considering CT examination in daily clinical situations.

Highlights

  • Ionizing radiation from Computed tomography (CT) examinations and the associated health risks are growing concerns

  • These result from the following two phenomena: the direct exposure dose to each organ, and the scatter exposure dose to each organ

  • The measured doses of surface and shallow organs were higher than those of deep organs, during CT scanning with the same irradiation conditions (130 kV, 100 mAs) (Table 2a)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ionizing radiation from Computed tomography (CT) examinations and the associated health risks are growing concerns. This study could provide valuable information on individual organ doses and their trends under various scanning conditions. These data could be referenced and used when considering CT examination in daily clinical situations. Its use has resulted in improved diagnosis and treatment of cancer, trauma, stroke, and cardiac ­conditions[1,2]. For these reasons, CT has become standard equipment for medical imaging. A major concern associated with the widespread adoption of CT scanning is increased radiation exposure to patients. It was estimated that 1.5–2% of cancers in the United States may be attributable to radiation from diagnostic C­ T6

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call