Direct in vitro and in vivo comparison of 161Tb and 177Lu using a tumour-targeting folate conjugate

Abstract

The radiolanthanide (161)Tb (T 1/2 = 6.90 days, Eβ(-) av = 154 keV) was recently proposed as a potential alternative to (177)Lu (T 1/2 = 6.71 days, Eβ(-) av = 134 keV) due to similar physical decay characteristics but additional conversion and Auger electrons that may enhance the therapeutic efficacy. The goal of this study was to compare (161)Tb and (177)Lu in vitro and in vivo using a tumour-targeted DOTA-folate conjugate (cm09). (161)Tb-cm09 and (177)Lu-cm09 were tested in vitro on folate receptor (FR)-positive KB and IGROV-1 cancer cells using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) viability assay. In vivo (161)Tb-cm09 and (177)Lu-cm09 (10 MBq, 0.5 nmol) were investigated in two different tumour mouse models with regard to the biodistribution, the possibility for single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging and the antitumour efficacy. Potentially undesired side effects were monitored over 6 months by determination of plasma parameters and examination of kidney function with quantitative SPECT using (99m)Tc-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA). To obtain half-maximal inhibition of tumour cell viability a 4.5-fold (KB) and 1.7-fold (IGROV-1) lower radioactivity concentration was required for (161)Tb-cm09 (IC50 ~0.014 MBq/ml and ~2.53 MBq/ml) compared to (177)Lu-cm09 (IC50 ~0.063 MBq/ml and ~4.52 MBq/ml). SPECT imaging visualized tumours of mice with both radioconjugates. However, in therapy studies (161)Tb-cm09 reduced tumour growth more efficiently than (177)Lu-cm09. These findings were in line with the higher absorbed tumour dose for (161)Tb-cm09 (3.3 Gy/MBq) compared to (177)Lu-cm09 (2.4 Gy/MBq). None of the monitored parameters indicated signs of impaired kidney function over the whole time period of investigation after injection of the radiofolates. Compared to (177)Lu-cm09 we demonstrated equal imaging features for (161)Tb-cm09 but an increased therapeutic efficacy for (161)Tb-cm09 in both tumour cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Further preclinical studies using other tumour-targeting radioconjugates are clearly necessary to draw final conclusions about the future clinical perspectives of (161)Tb.