Abstract
Direct forecasting has recently been proposed as a method for uncertainty quantification in non-linear inverse problems. The method directly forecasts a desired future response without the need for full model inversion. The method has been successfully applied to a range of subsurface field cases, such as groundwater, shallow and deep geothermal and oil/gas predictions. In this paper, we extend the framework of direct forecasting to do what it was avoided to do in the first place: model inversion. The idea is simple: replace the prediction variables with the model variables. Two challenges now occur: the model dimensions, in subsurface realm at least, are much higher than data variables. This is the case in the paper where we consider dynamic data and high-dimensional spatial models for geological structure and properties. Secondly, the regression applied in the original method, being a linear regression of prediction variables on transformed data, is unlikely to lead to models that match field observations. We address these challenges first by adding a variable selection method (through global sensitivity analysis) for the model space. More specifically, we select those model components that are most sensitive to data variables only. The linear assumption is mitigated by a sequential updating of sensitive model variables. We illustrate our method on a Libyan oil reservoir with complex geological uncertainty involving structural, petrophysical and fluid model parameters.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.