Abstract

ABSTRACTThe underestimation of Shigella species as a cause of childhood diarrhea disease has become increasingly apparent with quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based diagnostic methods versus culture. We sought to confirm qPCR-based detection of Shigella via a metagenomics approach. Three groups of samples were selected from diarrheal cases from the Global Enteric Multicenter Study: nine Shigella culture-positive and qPCR-positive (culture+ qPCR+) samples, nine culture-negative but qPCR-positive (culture− qPCR+) samples, and nine culture-negative and qPCR-negative (culture− qPCR−) samples. Fecal DNA was sequenced using paired-end Illumina HiSeq, whereby 3.26 × 108 ± 5.6 × 107 high-quality reads were generated for each sample. We used Kraken software to compare the read counts specific to “Shigella” among the three groups. The proportions of Shigella-specific nonhuman sequence reads between culture+ qPCR+ (0.65 ± 0.42%) and culture− qPCR+ (0.55 ± 0.31%) samples were similar (Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.627) and distinct from the culture− qPCR− group (0.17 ± 0.15%, P < 0.05). The read counts of sequences previously targeted by Shigella/enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC) qPCR assays, namely, ipaH, virA, virG, ial, ShET2, and ipaH3, were also similar between the culture+ qPCR+ and culture− qPCR+ groups and distinct from the culture− qPCR− groups (P < 0.001). Kraken performed well versus other methods: its precision and recall of Shigella were excellent at the genus level but variable at the species level. In summary, metagenomic sequencing indicates that Shigella/EIEC qPCR-positive samples are similar to those of Shigella culture-positive samples in Shigella sequence composition, thus supporting qPCR as an accurate method for detecting Shigella.

Highlights

  • The underestimation of Shigella species as a cause of childhood diarrhea disease has become increasingly apparent with quantitative PCR-based diagnostic methods versus culture

  • Most molecular diagnostics amplify the ipaH gene of Shigella, a gene that is shared by enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC)

  • There was no difference in total reads among the three sample groups (295.4 Ϯ 42.8 ϫ 106 for Shigella cultureϩ qPCRϩ samples, 295.4 Ϯ 47.7 ϫ 106 for Shigella cultureϪ qPCRϩ samples, and 329.5 Ϯ 59.2 ϫ 106 for Shigella cultureϪ qPCRϪ samples; P Ͼ 0.05)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The underestimation of Shigella species as a cause of childhood diarrhea disease has become increasingly apparent with quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based diagnostic methods versus culture. The proportions of Shigella-specific nonhuman sequence reads between cultureϩ qPCRϩ (0.65 Ϯ 0.42%) and cultureϪ qPCRϩ (0.55 Ϯ 0.31%) samples were similar (Mann-Whitney U test, P ϭ 0.627) and distinct from the cultureϪ qPCRϪ group (0.17 Ϯ 0.15%, P Ͻ 0.05). The read counts of sequences previously targeted by Shigella/enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC) qPCR assays, namely, ipaH, virA, virG, ial, ShET2, and ipaH3, were similar between the cultureϩ qPCRϩ and cultureϪ qPCRϩ groups and distinct from the cultureϪ qPCRϪ groups (P Ͻ 0.001). There are still more than 50,000 deaths annually from Shigella, primarily in children in developing countries [1, 2] It was identified as one of the top four pathogens causing moderate-to-severe diarrhea in the recent Global Enteric Multicenter Study (GEMS) [3]. Our hypothesis was that culture-positive and quantitative-PCR-positive (cultureϩ qPCRϩ) samples should be similar to cultureϪ qPCRϩ samples in terms of “Shigella” sequence

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call