Abstract

BackgroundIn agriculture, information about the spatial distribution of crop height is valuable for applications such as biomass and yield estimation, or increasing field work efficiency in terms of fertilizing, applying pesticides, irrigation, etc. Established methods for capturing crop height often comprise restrictions in terms of cost and time efficiency, flexibility, and temporal and spatial resolution of measurements. Furthermore, crop height is mostly derived from a measurement of the bare terrain prior to plant growth and measurements of the crop surface when plants are growing, resulting in the need of multiple field campaigns. In our study, we examine a method to derive crop heights directly from data of a plot of full grown maize plants captured in a single field campaign. We assess continuous raster crop height models (CHMs) and individual plant heights derived from data collected with the low-cost 3D camera Microsoft® Kinect® for Xbox One™ based on a comprehensive comparison to terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) reference data.ResultsWe examine single measurements captured with the 3D camera and a combination of the single measurements, i.e. a combination of multiple perspectives. The quality of both CHMs, and individual plant heights is improved by combining the measurements. R2 of CHMs derived from single measurements range from 0.48 to 0.88, combining all measurements leads to an R2 of 0.89. In case of individual plant heights, an R2 of 0.98 is achieved for the combined measures (with R2 = 0.44 for the single measurements). The crop heights derived from the 3D camera measurements comprise an average underestimation of 0.06 m compared to TLS reference values.ConclusionWe recommend the combination of multiple low-cost 3D camera measurements, removal of measurement artefacts, and the inclusion of correction functions to improve the quality of crop height measurements. Operating low-cost 3D cameras under field conditions on agricultural machines or on autonomous platforms can offer time and cost efficient tools for capturing the spatial distribution of crop heights directly in the field and subsequently to advance agricultural efficiency and productivity. More general, all processes which include the 3D geometry of natural objects can profit from low-cost methods producing 3D geodata.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13007-016-0150-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • In agriculture, information about the spatial distribution of crop height is valuable for applications such as biomass and yield estimation, or increasing field work efficiency in terms of fertilizing, applying pesticides, irrigation, etc

  • Large distance values are contained in all measurements, and the standard deviation is relatively large in all cases which means that some measurement artefacts occur within the volume delimited by the field of view (FOV) edges

  • In case of the measurements taken with the sensor directly facing into the sun, a column of measurement artefacts occurs in direction of the sun

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Information about the spatial distribution of crop height is valuable for applications such as biomass and yield estimation, or increasing field work efficiency in terms of fertilizing, applying pesticides, irrigation, etc. We assess continuous raster crop height models (CHMs) and individual plant heights derived from data collected with the low-cost 3D camera Microsoft® Kinect® for Xbox OneTM based on a comprehensive comparison to terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) reference data. Information about crop height and its spatial distribution is of high value for agriculture By including this information into the management and field work processes, Examples for the usage of crop height models (CHMs) are site-specific crop management [4, 5], plant nitrogen estimates [6], and yield and biomass estimations [7,8,9]. Marx et al [19] describe subjective crop height data collection using smartphone devices by non-experts and successfully derive seamless crop height models of high quality when compared to TLS reference data. Another approach is suggested in [20, 21] where the crop height is directly derived via the distance between a LiDAR device and the crop surface

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.