Abstract

We discuss the impact of physics beyond the Standard Model on direct CP violation in charm. On general grounds, models in which the primary source of flavor violation is linked to the breaking of chiral symmetry (left-right flavor mixing) are natural candidates to explain this effect, via enhanced chromomagnetic operators. In the case of super-symmetric models, we identify two motivated scenarios: disoriented A-terms and split families. Non-supersymmetric models with Z-mediated and scalar-mediated FCNC are also discussed.

Highlights

  • Models in which the flavor hierarchies are explained without invoking the hypothesis of minimal flavor violation [4]

  • To the case of supersymmetry with split families, if we assume that the transition between the first two generations is induced only as a result of 1–3 and 2–3 mixings, the couplings necessary to generate |∆aCP | ≈ 10−2 lead to effects in D0 − D 0 mixing well below the current experimental bounds

  • It is not easy to assess whether new physics is necessary to explain the evidence for CP violation in charm, observed by LHCb through the difference in the time-integrated asymmetries in the decays D0 → K+K− and D0 → π+π− [5]

Read more

Summary

CP violation in the charm system

The singly-Cabibbo-suppressed decay amplitude Af (Af ) of D0 (D 0) to a CP eigenstate f can be decomposed as [10]. A detailed translation of these bounds into corresponding constraints on the coefficients of dimension-six ∆C = 2 effective operators, obtained under the assumption that nonstandard contributions can at most saturate the above experimental bounds, can be found in ref. The time-integrated CP asymmetry for neutral D meson decays into a CP eigenstate f , defined in eq (1.2), receives both direct and indirect CP-violating contributions. This cancellation is not exact in eq (1.1) because of different propertime cuts in the two decay modes [5] This effect, as well as similar corrections in the previous measurements of time-integrated CP asymmetries [6,7,8], have been taken into account by HFAG [9] in obtaining the averages reported in (1.3) and (2.13)

Other observables
Top FCNC
Supersymmetry
Disoriented A terms
Alignment models
Split families
Top and stop phenomenology
New-physics scenarios with Z-mediated FCNC
Low-energy constraints
Implications for top-quark physics
New-physics scenarios with scalar-mediated FCNC
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.