Abstract

Cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging can detect coronary artery disease and is an alternative to single-photon emission computed tomography or positron emission tomography. However, the complex, non-linear MR signal and the lack of robust quantification of myocardial blood flow have hindered its widespread clinical application thus far. Recently, a new Bayesian approach was developed for brain imaging and evaluation of perfusion indexes (Kudo et al., 2014). In addition to providing accurate perfusion measurements, this probabilistic approach appears more robust than previous approaches, particularly due to its insensitivity to bolus arrival delays. We assessed the performance of this approach against a well-known and commonly deployed model-independent method based on the Fermi function for cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging. The methods were first evaluated for accuracy and precision using a digital phantom to test them against the ground truth; next, they were applied in a group of coronary artery disease patients. The Bayesian method can be considered an appropriate model-independent method with which to estimate myocardial blood flow and delays. The digital phantom comprised a set of synthetic time-concentration curve combinations generated with a 2-compartment exchange model and a realistic combination of perfusion indexes, arterial input dynamics, noise and delays collected from the clinical dataset. The myocardial blood flow values estimated with the two methods showed an excellent correlation coefficient (r2 > 0.9) under all noise and delay conditions. The Bayesian approach showed excellent robustness to bolus arrival delays, with a similar performance to Fermi modeling when delays were considered. Delays were better estimated with the Bayesian approach than with Fermi modeling. An in vivo analysis of coronary artery disease patients revealed that the Bayesian approach had an excellent ability to distinguish between abnormal and normal myocardium. The Bayesian approach was able to discriminate not only flows but also delays with increased sensitivity by offering a clearly enlarged range of distribution for the physiologic parameters.

Highlights

  • Coronary artery disease (CAD) and microvascular dysfunction are the major mechanisms leading to perfusion abnormalities

  • The complexity of the models relative to the cardiac data, characterized by reduced sample time due to breathhold duration and more variability related to motion, led to difficulties in model fitting with multiple distinct combinations of parameters estimation low precision at the clinically observed noise level further failing to convince clinicians

  • Even using the simplest Fermi model, fitting was reported to fail in 10% of cases using concentration curves averaged over a segment of the myocardium (Broadbent et al, 2013)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Coronary artery disease (CAD) and microvascular dysfunction are the major mechanisms leading to perfusion abnormalities. Microvascular dysfunction, which is responsible for true ischemic signs despite nearly normal coronary arteries, is a very challenging diagnosis. In CAD, clinical decision making relies on the relationship between symptoms and the degree of coronary lesions. In all these scenarios, cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging has been proposed as an important detection tool and a gatekeeper for invasive diagnostic procedures and percutaneous coronary interventions. Measures of myocardial blood flow (MBF) contribute to unraveling the specific pathophysiological mechanisms underlying preclinical conditions and provide a more reliable characterization of CAD burden (Knaapen, 2014)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call