Abstract

Potential risks of genetically modified (GM) crops must be identified before their commercialization, as happens with all new technologies. One of the major concerns is the proper risk assessment of adventitious presence of transgenic material in rice fields due to cross-pollination. Several studies have been conducted in order to quantify pollen-mediated gene flow from transgenic rice (Oryza sativa) to both conventional rice and red rice weed (O. sativa f. spontanea) under field conditions. Some of these studies reported GM pollen-donor rice transferring GM traits to red rice. However, gene flow also occurs in the opposite direction, in a phenomenon that we have called reverse gene flow, resulting in transgenic seeds that have incorporated the traits of wild red rice. We quantified reverse gene flow using material from two field trials. A molecular analysis based on amplified fragment length polymorphisms was carried out, being complemented with a phenotypic identification of red rice traits. In both field trials, the reverse gene flow detected was greater than the direct gene flow. The rate of direct gene flow varied according to the relative proportions of the donor (GM rice) and receptor (red rice) plants and was influenced by wind direction. The ecological impact of reverse gene flow is limited in comparison with that of direct gene flow because non-shattered and non-dormant seeds would be obtained in the first generation. Hybrid seed would remain in the spike and therefore most of it would be removed during harvesting. Nevertheless, this phenomenon must be considered in fields used for elite seed production and in developing countries where farmers often keep some seed for planting the following year. In these cases, there is a higher risk of GM red rice weed infestation increasing from year to year and therefore a proper monitoring plan needs to be established.

Highlights

  • Genetic modification technologies are widely used as a way to introduce new genetic traits into crops of interest

  • The gene flow from genetically modified (GM) to conventional rice was evaluated so that we could compare our results with those obtained in field trial 1 (Messeguer et al 2004), in which the direct and reverse flows were quantified

  • This review shows that the frequency of rice-to-rice gene flow was generally low (,1 %)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Genetic modification technologies are widely used as a way to introduce new genetic traits into crops of interest. One of the main environmental concerns about these technologies is the non-controlled gene spread between crops at different levels. There are many studies studying this phenomenon and reporting guidelines to minimize the risk of cross-pollination between modified plants and non-modified crop plants (Mallory-Smith and Zapiola 2008; Devos et al 2009). These studies propose solutions like the use of different crop species working as a natural barrier against cross-pollination, minimum distances

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call