Abstract

Aquatic organisms inhabiting polluted waterways face numerous adverse effects, including physiological disruption by endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs). Little is known about how the temperatures associated with global climate change may influence the response of organisms exposed to EDCs, and the effects that these combined stressors may have on molecular endpoints such as gene expression. We exposed Menidia beryllina (inland silversides) to environmentally relevant concentrations (1 ng/L) of two estrogenic EDCs (bifenthrin and 17α-ethinylestradiol; EE2) at 22 °C and 28 °C. We conducted this experiment over multiple generations to better understand the potential effects to chronically exposed populations in the wild. We exposed adult parental fish (F0) for 14 days prior to spawning of the next generation. F1 larvae were then exposed from fertilization until 21 days post hatch (dph) before being transferred to clean water tanks. F1 larvae were reared to adulthood, then spawned in clean water to test for further effects of parental exposure on offspring (F2 generation). Gene expression was quantified by performing qPCR on F0 and F1 gonads, as well as F1 and F2 larvae. We did not detect any significant differences in the expression of genes measured in the parental or F1 adult gonads. We found that the 28 °C EE2 treatment significantly decreased the expression of nearly all genes measured in the F1 larvae. This pattern was transferred to the F2 generation for expression of the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) gene. Expression of 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (17β-HSD) and G protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30) revealed changes not measured in the previous generation. Effects of the bifenthrin treatments were not observed until the F2 generation, which were exposed to the chemicals indirectly as germ cells. Our results indicate that effects of EDCs and their interactions with abiotic factors, may not be adequately represented by singular generation testing. These findings will contribute to the determination of the risk of EDC contamination to organisms inhabiting contaminated waterways under changing temperature regimes.

Highlights

  • Many chemicals intended for human use, such as pharmaceuticals and pesticides, are found to pollute adjacent waterways and some are known to disrupt endocrine function (Brander et al, 2013; Kuivila et al, 2012; Weston & Lydy, 2012; Brander et al, 2016a)

  • We investigated the effects of two estrogenic Endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) (EE2 and bifenthrin) on genes involved in development and reproduction of M. beryllina, at two temperatures: 22 ◦C and 28 ◦C, to understand how rising temperatures may influence the toxicity of these chemicals

  • There were no significant differences in gene expression of the F1 larvae among any of the 22 ◦C treatments, and we found there were no significant changes in gene expression in any of the genes tested in the adult F1 ovaries (Fig. S3) or testes (Fig. S4) in any of the chemical or temperature treatments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many chemicals intended for human use, such as pharmaceuticals and pesticides, are found to pollute adjacent waterways and some are known to disrupt endocrine function (Brander et al, 2013; Kuivila et al, 2012; Weston & Lydy, 2012; Brander et al, 2016a). The synthetic estrogen found in oral contraceptives, 17αethinylestradiol (EE2), has been shown to reduce egg production, influence sex ratios, and influence development in fishes exposed to environmentally relevant concentrations (Kidd et al, 2007; Vajda et al, 2008; Schwindt et al, 2014; Bhandari, Vom Saal & Tillitt, 2015) Many pesticides, such as the commonly used pyrethroid pesticide, bifenthrin, can produce estrogenic effects at low doses that deviates from their intended mode of action on the sodium channels of presynaptic neurons of target pests (Brander et al, 2013). Like EE2, bifenthrin has been shown to impact fishes at multiple levels of biological organization; e.g., gene expression, leading to impaired development and reproduction (Brander et al, 2016a; Brander et al, 2016b; Tu et al, 2016)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call