Direct and indirect monomer elution from an RBC product family

Abstract

ObjectiveTo develop a model for quantitative comparison of elutable substances by direct elution from resin-bonded composite (RBC) test specimens versus indirect elutability of substances from RBC-restored teeth. Furthermore, it was to be investigated whether the different composites of the Tetric® RBC product family release different types and amounts of substances. MethodsFour different composite materials from the Tetric® product family were studied. For each material subgroup ten human third molar teeth were prepared with standard Class-I occlusal cavities. These ‘tooth group’ specimens were provided with a three-step adhesive system (incorporating TEGDMA) and the respective composite restoration. Same sized control specimens, of each RBC restorative material, were prepared (‘direct RBC’ groups). All specimens were placed in individual elution chambers such that the elution media (ethanol/water, 3:1) only came into contact with either the tooth root or ¾ height of the ‘direct RBC’ materials. They were incubated at 37 °C for up to 7 d. Samples of the eluant were taken after 1, 2, 4 and 7 d and were analysed by high-temperature gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. ResultsBisphenol A ethoxylate dimethacrylate (bisEMA), bisphenol A glycidyldimethacrylate (bisGMA), tetraethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEEGDMA), decan-1,10-diol dimethacrylate (DDDMA) were mostly found in the eluates of the ‘direct RBC’ groups in statistically significantly greater amounts than in the eluates of the ‘tooth groups’. Such quantitative differences were also the case with eluates containing bisphenol A (BPA), dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP) and drometrizole, which are common in the environment. In contrast to the behavior found with all the other monomers, up to 3 orders of magnitude more triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) was found in the ‘tooth groups’ compared to the ‘direct RBC’ groups, evidently released by the adhesive system. SignificanceThe release of most of the substances was clearly delayed in the ‘tooth groups’ indicative of their chronic, rather than acute, elution to the oral environment. A barrier function of the residual dentin layer and the adhesion layer can be inferred. The different release patterns of substances from the various composites of the RBC product family is a manifestation of their different and indication-specific compositions. Consideration of an overall restorative care (RBC plus adhesive) system, when assessing the total amount of released substances, is emphasized.