Abstract

AbstractCompetitive interactions and resource partitioning facilitate species coexistence in complex ecosystems. However, while pairwise interactions between ecologically similar species have been well studied, multi‐species competitive networks have received less attention. When interference competition between two species results in partitioning of resources, this may have indirect consequences for other species distributed along the same resource gradient. Here, we tested whether interference competition between two territorial damselfish influenced the fine‐scale species distributions of five other territorial damselfish in Kimbe Bay, Papua New Guinea. These species partition habitat across three reef zones—the flat, crest, and slope, with distinct patterns of distribution within these zones. We predicted the two species with similar distributions and microhabitat use, Pomacentrus adelus and Pomacentrus bankanensis, would display the greatest level of aggression toward one another. This was tested through an intruder experiment where stimulus fish were introduced into a resident's territory, which confirmed disproportionately high levels of interspecific aggression between these two species. We also predicted that the fine‐scale differences in the distribution of each species were maintained through multi‐species interference competition among neighboring species, with further indirect effects on species that did not directly interact. To test this, we conducted a large‐scale (22 × 10 m) experimental removal of the most abundant species, Po. adelus, and quantified the abundance and distribution of all territorial damselfish species for 6 months to a 25 cm resolution. The main direct competitor, Po. bankanensis, exhibited a marked increase in abundance and expanded its distribution (+1.33 m) to acquire the space previously occupied by Po. adelus. This competitive release triggered indirect effects on the distribution of other neighboring species further back on the reef flat, with Chrysiptera unimaculata moving into the zone formerly occupied by Po. bankanensis. This study indicates that the distinct distribution patterns among the reef crest species are linked to levels of interspecific agonistic behavior. We argue that the competitive release following the removal of a superior competitor resulted in both direct and indirect effects, with the immediate neighbor shifting into the newly available space, followed by successive shifts in species responding to the change in the distributions of their immediate neighbors.

Highlights

  • Competitive interactions among ecologically similar species are fundamental in shaping many ecological communities (Connell 1978, Schoener1983)

  • The levels of aggression Po. adelus displayed against Pomacentrus bankanensis were significantly higher than any other stimulus species (8.5 mean interactions per trial; Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD), P = 0.001; Fig. 2a)

  • Pomacentrus tripunctatus (2.3 mean interactions per trial) and Chrysiptera unimaculata (4.2 mean interactions per trial), received lower levels of aggression when compared to Po. bankanensis (Tukey’s HSD, P = 0.008, and P = 0.026 respectively)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Competitive interactions among ecologically similar species are fundamental in shaping many ecological communities (Connell 1978, Schoener1983). Resources was viewed in terms of a winner and a loser with the dominating species either partitioning or eliminating the subordinate from the habitat (Case and Gilpin 1974, Colwell and Fuentes 1975, Diamond 1978). Experimental studies on interspecific competition are still dominated by studies testing the effects pairs of species have on one another (Bonin et al 2015). Our empirical understanding of competitive networks has been limited by the absence of detailed information on the extent of resource partitioning and competition at a community scale, and the effects of interactions among species that do not come into direct contact (Amarasekare 2003, Salomon et al 2010, Siepielski and McPeek 2010, Hixon 2011)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call